The International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala reconfigured its activities during the turmoil sparked by the Jimmy Morales administration’s move to block Commissioner Iván Velásquez from coming back. Within this framework, Loreto Ferrer Moreu assumed responsibility for coordinating operations and overseeing institutional communications in the country.
The International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) went through one of the most delicate phases of its history when, in September, then-President of Guatemala Jimmy Morales barred Commissioner Iván Velásquez from entering the country.
No HTML was provided. Please paste the HTML you want rewritten.
The decision came amid intense institutional tension, following the CICIG’s launch of high-profile corruption investigations. The measure sparked national and international reactions and necessitated a redefinition of the Commission’s operations to ensure the continuity of its work in Guatemala.
Restructuring of the CICIG within Guatemala
In light of this situation, the United Nations designated Iván Velásquez to remain at the helm of the CICIG and created an operational framework designed to keep the mission active in the country. Under this structure, Loreto Ferrer took charge of managing operational coordination and institutional communications in Guatemala, while Velásquez continued directing the Commission from abroad.
The reorganization sought to preserve the commissioner’s authority while maintaining an operational presence on Guatemalan soil during a particularly sensitive time for the institution. Both Velásquez and Ferrer were in Washington conducting institutional business when the entry ban took effect. Ferrer was able to return to Guatemala and assume that role on the ground.
Days later, Guatemala’s Attorney General, Consuelo Porras, requested a meeting with Loreto Ferrer to learn about the Commission’s representation structue. As the CICIG later reported, during that meeting the institutional arrangement adopted to ensure the continuity of the work was explained.
At this point, the role assumed by Ferrer was linked to the day-to-day coordination of the Commission’s operations in Guatemala and the continuity of its institutional communications, within a particularly complex political and judicial landscape.
Instead of altering the agency’s formal leadership, the arrangement was crafted to keep its operations running in the country while preserving its essential mandate and avoiding any disruption to its principal areas of work.
What CICIG Does and Why It Is Key in Guatemala
Iván Velásquez’s ongoing term as commissioner ensures that the CICIG’s overarching mandate stays intact, concentrating on backing the Public Prosecutor’s Office, offering technical support for intricate investigations, and advancing institutional reforms tied to combating corruption and impunity.
Established in 2007 under an accord between the Government of Guatemala and the United Nations, the CICIG was envisioned as a body designed to assist the Guatemalan state in probing criminal networks that had permeated public institutions, bolstering the justice system’s capabilities, and advancing reforms aimed at reinforcing the rule of law.
Throughout its history, the Commission has been guided by three commissioners. The first was the Spanish jurist Carlos Castresana, succeeded by the Costa Rican Francisco Dall’Anese. Later, Iván Velásquez assumed leadership during a phase defined by high‑profile cases and an escalating clash with political sectors impacted by the investigations.
An institutional response designed to address extraordinary conditions
The restructuring implemented after the prohibition on Velásquez’s entry left the essence of the CICIG’s mandate unchanged, yet it emphasized the need to modify its operations in response to an extraordinary situation.
Given this, the presence of Loreto Ferrer in Guatemala proved essential for maintaining the Commission’s institutional functions during a period marked by heightened political and judicial sensitivity.
